A Note
on Acroporidea Corals of Andaman and Nicobar Islands,
India
Tamal Mondal1*, C. Raghunathan1 and K.
Venkataraman2
1Zoological Survey of India, Andaman and Nicobar
Regional Centre, National Coral Reef Research Institute, Haddo,
Port Blair-744 102 Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India
2Zoological Survey of India, Prani Vigyan Bhawan,
M- Block, New Alipore, Kolkata-700 053, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: t_genetics@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
Diversity of scleractinian
corals in the world ocean demonstrated by the species belong to the family Acroporidae. Andaman and Nicobar Islands represent a total
of 158 species of acroporids which is equivalent to
57.04% of the global diversity. The numerical data on Shannon-Weaver diversity
(H'), Simpson’s density (D) and Pielou’s evenness (J)
indices showed a healthy state of acroporids in these
islands. South Andaman region can be emphasized as the best reef environment
area followed by North and Middle Andaman region and Nicobar region as all the
indices such as H' (5.82), D (0.98) and J (0.94) show maximized value.
KEYWORDS: Acroporidae,
diversity, density, evenness, Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
INTRODUCTION:
Andaman and Nicobar Islands comprises of 572 islands in 900km long
from Landfall Island in the north to Great Nicobar Island at the south are
representing a variety of faunal communities. Scleractinian
corals are the most important life form of the shallow water environment of
tropical sea including A and N Islands. Among the known 25 families (Venkataraman and Satyanarayana,
2012) of scleractinian, Acroporids
are the most important representatives with the maximum number of 277
individuals belong to 4 gerera, of which 182 species
belong to Acropora, 7 species belong to Anacropora, 13 species belong to Astreopora and 75 species belong to Montipora (Veron,
2000). Acroporidae, the reef building corals, are
very important due to their reef assemblage in the Indo-Pacific Oceans. The
species under the genus Acropora is found in quite diversified form and
popular in respect to their growth forms like branching, cluster, busy,
finger-like etc. Species of this family is also known as small polyp scleractinian. Anacropora is the
genus with slow growth rate and it is closely similar to Montipora. Astreopora species are mound shaped or
encrusting. Montipora
represents second maximum number of species followed by Acropora. The species under Montipora can be
seen as branching, foliaceous, laminar, encrusting,
and fingered with “fuzzy” polyps.
In 2003, Venkataraman
et al. described 70 species of acroporids
under 3 gerera which include 20 species of genus Montipora, 47 species of genus Acropora and 3 species of genus Astreopora corals
from India where as 70 species of acroporids 54
species belong to 3 genera such as 10 species of genus Montipora, 42 species of genus Acropora and 2
species of genus Astreopora
were reported from Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
In 2012, Venkataraman and Satyanarayana
described key characters for 99 species of acroporids
belong to 3 above said genera such as 26 species under Montipora, 67species under Acropora and 6
species belong to Astreopora.
The present study describes diversity and distribution of a total 158 species
of acroporids under four genera viz
Genus Acropora
with 105 species, Anacopora with 2 species, Astreopora with 8 species and Montipora with 43
species from Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS:
A total of 290 sites of Andaman and
Nicobar Islands were studied during underwater surveys by employing Self-Contained
Underwater Breathing Apparatus (SCUBA) diving, snorkeling during the period of
July, 2009 to January, 2013 to record the species of scleractinian
corals. A series of 20 m
transects were placed at random sampling method to continue Line Intercept Transect
Method (Bradbury et al., 1986) along
with the Quadrate methods (Endean and Stablum, 1973)
to explore the diversity of the scleractinian corals
of the surveyed areas. Photography of quadrates was made with a housed digital
camera (Sony - Cyber shot, Model-T900, marine pack, 12.1 megapixels and Sony -
Cyber shot, Model-TX1, marine pack, 10.2 megapixels).
Identification of species was made in conjunction with Veron
and Wallace (1984) and Veron (2000).
The species
diversity of corals was evaluated following Shannon-Weaver diversity index
formula as described below (Shannon, 1948)
H'= -∑pi ln pi
Where, pi =
Proportion of number of individual of a particular species and total number of
individual of all the species, H'= diversity of a theoretically infinite
population.
Simpson’s
diversity index (Simpson, 1949) is one of the truthful indices to calculate the
species diversity of any study site. It has been applied to calculate the
species diversity of scleractinian corals of those
islands.
The formula for the Simpson index is:
D=1-![]()
Where S is the number of species, N is the total
percentage cover or total number of organisms and n is the percentage
cover of a species or number of organisms of a species. In this form, D ranges
from 1 to 0, with 1 representing infinite diversity and 0 representing no
diversity.
Evenness of a community was described by the Pielou’s
Evenness Index (J’). The formula of the index is (Pielou,
1966)
J’=H'/H'max
Where H' is the number derived from the
Shannon diversity.
RESULTS:
A total of 158 species (Table-1) of scleractinians
were reported from the entire Andaman and Nicobar Islands during the study
periods. Species under all the four genera were reported during the scleractinian exploration. The entire study areas were
divided in three regions to make a comprehensive report on their diversity,
distribution and evenness. All the four genera were reported only from South
Andaman whereas other two represent the three among those except Anacropora. The
genus Acropora represents the maximum number of 105
species among the total report of 158 species while Anacropora represents only 2 species exclusively from South Andaman. North
and Middle Andamans represent the maximum number of
92 species under Acropora whereas South Andaman represents the
maximum number of 36 species under Montipora. Species
belonging to Astreopora were reported same in number (7
species) from both the areas such as North and Middle Andaman and South
Andaman. Nicobar region represent the minimum number of species under the three
genera such as Acropora,
Astreopora
and Montipora. A maximum number of 136 species were
reported from South Andaman while the minimum of 52 were from Nicobar (Table
1). All the analyzed indices such as Shannon-Weaver diversity index, Simpson’s
density index and Pielou’s evenness index were
maximum (5.82, 0.98 and 0.94) at South Andaman while minimum (4.5, 0.91 and
0.91) was encounter at Nicobar (Fig. 1).
Table 1: Checklist of Acroporidae
corals of Andaman and Nicobar Islands
|
Sl. No. |
Species |
North and Middle Andaman |
South Andaman |
Nicobar |
|
|
Family ACROPORIDAE Verrill, 1902 |
|
|
|
|
|
Genus Acropora Oken, 1815 |
|
|
|
|
1. |
Acropora austera (Dana,1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
2. |
Acropora abrotanoides (Lamarck, 1816) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
3. |
Acropora anthocercis (Brook, 1893) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
4. |
Acropora awi Wallace and Wolstenholme,1998 |
+ |
- |
- |
|
5. |
Acropora sekiseiensis Veron, 1990 |
+ |
- |
- |
|
6. |
Acropora cerealis (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
7. |
Acropora elizabethensis
Veron, 2000 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
8. |
Acropora cuneata (Dana, 1846) |
- |
+ |
- |
|
9. |
Acropora bifurcata Nemenzo, 1971 |
+ |
+ |
|
|
10. |
Acropora chesterfieldensis Veron and
Wallace, 1984 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
11. |
Acropora copiosa Nemenzo,1967 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
12. |
Acropora cophodactyla (Brook, 1892) |
+ |
- |
- |
|
13. |
Acropora cytherea (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
14. |
Acropora donei Veron and Wallace, 1984 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
15. |
Acropora efflorescens (Dana,1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
16. |
Acropora elseyi (Brook,1892) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
17. |
Acropora exquisita Nemenzo,1971 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
18. |
Acropora fastigata Nemenzo, 1967 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
19. |
Acropora forskali (Ehrenberg,1834) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
20. |
Acropora formosa (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
21. |
Acropora inermis (Brook, 1891) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
22. |
Acropora plantaginea (Lamark, 1816) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
23. |
Acropora granulosa (MED and H, 1860) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
24. |
Acropora globiceps (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
25. |
Acropora hemprichii (Ehrenberg,1834) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
26. |
Acropora haimei (Milne Edwards and Haime,
1860) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
27. |
Acropora hoeksemai Wallace, 1997 |
+ |
- |
- |
|
28. |
Acropora horrida (Dana, 1836) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
29. |
Acropora humilis(Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
30. |
Acropora hyacinthus (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
31. |
Acropora insignis Nemenzo, 1967 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
32. |
Acropora kosurini Wallace, 1994 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
33. |
Acropora kimbeensis Wallace, 1999 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
34. |
Acropora latistella (Brook, 1891) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
35. |
Acropora loisetteae Wallace, 1994 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
36. |
Acropora loripes (Brook, 1892) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
37. |
Acropora longicyathus (MED and H, 1860) |
- |
+ |
- |
|
38. |
Acropora lutkeni Crossland, 1952 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
39. |
Acropora mirabilis (Quelch,1886) |
- |
+ |
- |
|
40. |
Acropora millepora(Ehrenberg, 1834) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
41. |
Acropora minuta Veron, 2000 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
42. |
Acropora monticulosa (Bruggemann,
1879) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
43. |
Acropora microclados (Ehrenberg, 1834) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
44. |
Acropora microphthalma (Verrill, 1859) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
45. |
Acropora nasuta (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
46. |
Acropora proximalis Veron, 2000 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
47. |
Acropora nana (Studer, 1878) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
48. |
Acropora nobilis (Dana 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
49. |
Acropora ocellata (Bernard, 1896) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
50. |
Acropora paniculata Verrill, 1902 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
51. |
Acropora palmerae Wells, 1954 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
52. |
Acropora papillare Latypov, 1992 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
53. |
Acropora palifera (Lamarck, 1816) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
54. |
Acropora crateriformis (Gardiner, 1898) |
- |
- |
+ |
|
55. |
Acropora pulchra (Brook, 1891) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
56. |
Acropora polystoma (Brook, 1891) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
57. |
Acropora pharaonis (Milne Edwards and Haime,
1860) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
58. |
Acropora rudis (Rehberg, 1892) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
59. |
Acropora robusta (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
60. |
Acropora roseni Wallace, 1999 |
+ |
- |
- |
|
61. |
Acropora selago (Studer, 1878) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
62. |
Acropora speciosa (Quelch, 1886) |
- |
+ |
- |
|
63. |
Acropora natalensis (Riegl, 1995) |
+ |
- |
+ |
|
64. |
Acropora squarrosa (Ehrenberg,1834) |
+ |
- |
- |
|
65. |
Acropora striata (Verrill, 1866) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
66. |
Acropora tutuilensis (Hoffmeister,
1925) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
67. |
Acropora subglabra (Brook,1891) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
68. |
Acropora wallaceae (Veron, 1990) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
69. |
Acropora valenciennesi (Milne Edwards and Haime,
1860) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
70. |
Acropora tanegashimensis
(Veron,
1990) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
71. |
Acropora variolosa (Klunzinger,
1879) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
72. |
Acropora vaughani Wells, 1954 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
73. |
Acropora verweyi(Veron and
Wallace,1984) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
74. |
Acropora aspera (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
75. |
Acropora plana (Nemanzo, 1967) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
76. |
Acropora brueggemanni (Brook, 1893) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
77. |
Acropora clathrata (Brook, 1891) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
78. |
Acropora caroliniana Namenzo, 1976 |
+ |
- |
- |
|
79. |
Acropora multiacuta (Nemenzo, 1967) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
80. |
Acropora carduus (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
81. |
Acropora digitifera (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
82. |
Acropora divaricata (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
83. |
Acropora echinata (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
84. |
Acropora pinguis (Wells, 1950) |
- |
+ |
- |
|
85. |
Acropora florida (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
86. |
Acropora yongei (Veron and
Wallace, 1984) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
87. |
Acropora solitaryensis Veron and Wallace, 1984 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
88. |
Acropora secale (Studer, 1878) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
89. |
Acropora schmitti (Wells, 1950) |
- |
+ |
- |
|
90. |
Acropora gomezi (Veron, 2000) |
+ |
- |
- |
|
91. |
Acropora massawensis (Marenzelles, 1906) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
92. |
Acropora desalwii (Wallace, 1994) |
- |
- |
+ |
|
93. |
Acropora samoensis (Brook, 1891) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
94. |
Acropora spicifera (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
95. |
Acropora torresiana (Veron, 2000) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
96. |
Acropora glauca (Brook, 1893) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
97. |
Acropora gemmifera (Brook, 1892) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
98. |
Acropora dendrum (Bassett-Smith, 1890) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
99. |
Acropora grandis (Brook, 1892) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
100. |
Acropora teres (Verrill, 1866) |
+ |
- |
- |
|
101. |
Acropora subulata (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
102. |
Acropora tenuis (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
103. |
Acropora batunai Wallace, 1997 |
+ |
- |
- |
|
104. |
Acropora valida (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
- |
- |
|
105. |
Acropora turaki Wallace, 1994 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
|
Genus Anacropora
Ridley, 1884 |
|
|
|
|
106. |
Anacropora reticulata Veron and Wallace, 1984 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
107. |
Anacropora forbesi Ridley, 1884 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
|
Genus Astreopora
de Blainville, 1830 |
|
|
|
|
108. |
Astreopora gracilis Bernard, 1896 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
109. |
Astreopora incrustans Bernard, 1896 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
110. |
Astreopora ocellata Bernard, 1896 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
111. |
Astreopora listeri Bernard, 1896 |
+ |
- |
|
|
112. |
Astreopora myriophthalma (Lamarck,1816) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
113. |
Astreopora suggesta Wells,1954 |
- |
+ |
+ |
|
114. |
Astreopora cucullata Lamberts, 1980 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
115. |
Astreopora randalli Lamberts, 1980 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
|
Genus Montipora
de Blainville, 1830 |
|
|
|
|
116. |
Montipora aequituberculata
Barnard, 1897 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
117. |
Montipora angulata (Lamarck, 1816) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
118. |
Montipora caliculata (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
- |
- |
|
119. |
Montipora capitata Dana, 1846 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
120. |
Montipora cebuensis (Nemenzo,1976) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
121. |
Montipora crassituberculata
Bernard, 1897 |
- |
- |
+ |
|
122. |
Montipora danae (MED and H, 1851) |
- |
+ |
- |
|
123. |
Montipora delicatula (Veron, 2000) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
124. |
Montipora flabellata Studer, 1901 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
125. |
Montipora digitata (Dana, 1846) |
- |
+ |
- |
|
126. |
Montipora florida Nemenzo, 1967 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
127. |
Montipora corbettensis Veron and Wallace, 1984 |
- |
- |
+ |
|
128. |
Montipora foveolata (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
129. |
Montipora foliosa (Pallas, 1766) |
- |
+ |
+ |
|
130. |
Montipora hemispherica (Veron, 2000) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
131. |
Montipora samarensis Nemenzo, 1967 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
132. |
Montipora hispida (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
133. |
Montipora informis Bernard , 1897 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
134. |
Montipora grisea (Bernard, 1897) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
135. |
Montipora meandrina (Ehrenberg,1834) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
136. |
Montipora monasteriata (Forskal, 1775) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
137. |
Montipora peltiformis Benard, 1897 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
138. |
Montipora spumosa (Lamarck, 1816) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
139. |
Montipora spongiosa (Ehrenberg, 1834) |
+ |
- |
- |
|
140. |
Montipora gaimardi (Bernard, 1897) |
- |
+ |
- |
|
141. |
Montipora turgescens Bernard, 1897 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
142. |
Montipora turtlensis Veron and Pichon,
1984 |
- |
- |
+ |
|
143. |
Montipora tuberculosa Lamarck, 1816 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
144. |
Montipora venosa (Ehrenberg, 1834) |
- |
+ |
- |
|
145. |
Montipora verrucosa (Lamarck, 1816) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
146. |
Montipora verrilli Vaughan, 1907 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
147. |
Montipora incrassata (Dana, 1846) |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
148. |
Montipora undata Bernard, 1897 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
149. |
Montipora mollis(Bernard, 1897) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
150. |
Montipora circumvallata Ehrenberg, 1834 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
151. |
Montipora taiwanensis Veron, 2000 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
152. |
Montipora vietnamensis Veron, 2000 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
153. |
Montipora palawanensis Veron, 2000 |
+ |
- |
- |
|
154. |
Montipora verruculosus Veron, 2000 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
155. |
Montipora porites Veron, 2000 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
156. |
Montipora effusa Dana, 1846 |
- |
- |
+ |
|
157. |
Montipora efflorescens Bernard, 1897 |
- |
+ |
+ |
|
158. |
Montipora capricornis Veron, 1985 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
Total no. of species under the genus Acropora |
92 |
91 |
34 |
|
|
Total no. of species under the genus Anacropora |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
Total no. of species under the genus Astreopora |
7 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
Total no. of species under the genus Montipora |
28 |
36 |
17 |
|
|
Total
number of species |
127 |
136 |
52 |
|
|
Total number of genera |
3 |
4 |
3 |
Fig 1: Comparative study on species
diversity, density and evenness
DISCUSSION:
Biodiversity is the means of collective form of numerous types of
ecosystem to support the survival of the faunal and floral community through
their co-existence in a specific area within a given time. Scleractinian
corals are the one of the best supportive ecosystem for a wide range of faunal
communities in marine habitat. The extensive distributional range in between
Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn in this globe helped the scleractinians
to enrich their community with the presence of favorable biogenic habitat as
well as to support other associates. Due to the geographical situation in
Indo-Pacific regions, Andaman and Nicobar Islands harbor a great deal of marine
components in accordance of scleractinian corals (Hoeksema and Dai, 1992). Among the 17 reported scleractinian families from Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Acroporidae bears maximum number of species content in
comparison with other families. A total of 158 species was reported from these
islands during the extensive underwater faunal exploration which is equivalent
to 57.04% of global diversity of Acroporids. All the
regions supports a healthy state of scleractinian
corals as the Shannon-Weaver species diversity indices (H’) ranged between 4.2
to 5.82, Simposon’s density indices (D) in between
0.91 to 0.98 and Pielou’s evenness indices within the
range of 0.91 and 0.94. South Andaman region shows the maximum amplitudes of
all the indices whereas the minimum are seen in Nicobar region. With the said
framework it can be said that the South Andaman region is good enough to
support the acroporids coral for their sustainable
development in association with the others in these groups of archipelago. The
corals of this family are the most important creatures to give an alarming
signal to make people understand about the global climatic change or changing
marine environments (Tamal et al., in press). Regular monitoring measures and awareness programme will be helpful to know the scleractinian
corals for their sustainable development.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Authors are grateful to the Ministry of Environment and Forests,
Government of India for providing necessary financial assistance to undertake
the study through the projects of National Coral Reef Research Institute,
Zoological Survey of India, Port Blair. Authors are
also thankful to Department of Environment and Forests, Andaman and Nicobar
Administration for necessary permission to carry out the entire work.
REFERENCES:
1.
Bradbury
RH, Reichelt RE, Meyer DL, Birtles
RA. Patterns in the distribution of the crinoids
community at Davies Reef on the central Great Barrier Reef, Coral Reefs 5;
1886:189-196.
2.
Endean
R, Stablum W. A study of some aspects of the crown of
thorns starfish (A. planci) infestations of
reefs of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, Atoll Res. Bul. 167; 1973:1-60.
3.
Hoeksema
B, Dai CF.. Scleractinian of
Taiwan. II. Family Fungiidae (including a new
species). Bulletin of the Zoology Academia Sinica 30; 1992: 201-226.
4.
Pielou EC.
The measurement of diversity in different types ofbiological collections, J. Theor.
Biol. 13; 1966: 131-144.
5.
Shannon
CE. A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal 27;
1948: 379–423 and 623–656.
6.
Simpson
EH. Measurement of diversity, Nature 163; 1949: 688.
7.
Tamal Mondal, Raghunathan C and Venkataraman K. Post Bleaching recruitment of scleractinian corals, special reference to Acropora sp. (in press)
8.
Venkataraman
K and Satyanarayan Ch. Coral Identification manual,
2012:1-136.
9.
Venkataraman
K, Satyanarayana Ch, Alfred JRB, Wolstenholme
J. Handbook on Hard Corals of India, 1-266; 2003.
10.
Veron JEN.
Corals of the World. Australian Institute of Marine Science. Vol-1, 2000:pp 1-463.
11.
Veron JEN,
Wallace CC. Scleractinia of East Australia. Part
V. Aust Inst Mar Sci Monogr Ser 6, 1984.
Received on
08.08.2013 Modified on 25.10.2013
Accepted on 30.11.2013
©A&V Publications All right reserved
Research J.
Science and Tech. 6(1): Jan.-Mar. 2014; Page 25-29